Upper Washita River, Oklahoma
An ARS Benchmark Research Watershed
- Characteristics
The Upper Washita River Hydrologic Unit in southwest Oklahoma drains an area of 8260
km2 (827,000 ha). The Washita River is a tributary to the Red River, flowing into Lake
Texoma, the largest reservoir in Oklahoma. Monitoring and assessment for CEAP will
focus on two subwatersheds, (approximately 11-digit HUC size), the Little Washita River
and Fort Cobb Lake watersheds. The region is sparsely populated with predominantly
agricultural land use, consisting of mixed cropland and grazing land. Localized areas of
irrigated cropland exist in association with water supply from reservoirs or groundwater.
The region is underlain primarily by Permian sandstone, siltstone, and claystone. Both
watersheds receive about 76 cm of precipitation annually, with most of the precipitation
occurring during the spring and fall months.
The Fort Cobb Lake - Lake Creek subwatershed (78,800 ha) has mixed agricultural land
use, including rangeland/pasture (41%), dryland crops (41%), irrigated crops (10%),
forests (6%), and water (2%). Irrigation in the Fort Cobb Lake watershed is by center
pivot systems on sandy soils, supplied by groundwater. Cattle grazing, predominantly
stocker cattle, utilize the range and pasture lands. Confined swine operations are
located in the upper portions of the watershed. The reservoir provides public water
supply, fishing, boating, and wildlife habitat. Over 80% of the soils in the watershed are
fine sandy loams, with the remaining 17% having loamy and silt loam textures.
The 61,000 ha Little Washita River Experimental Watershed (LWREW) is also a mixed
land use watershed with pastures and grasslands (60 %), cropland (20 %), and
miscellaneous land-use (20 %). There are 45 USDA-funded flood control structures
within the Little Washita River subwatershed. There are 64 defined soil series in the
LWREW, with fine sand, loamy fine sand, fine sandy loam, loam and silty loams being
the predominant textures of the soil surface. In general, soils with moderate infiltration
rates cover approximately 70% of the watershed.
+ Environmental Impacts
1. Sedimentation and nutrient (phosphorous and nitrogen) loading.
2. Channel instability in some of the tributaries.
3. Impaired water bodies for municipal water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife.
4. Degradation of wildlife habitat.
+ Management Practices
1. Pasture and hay planting (512)
2. Grassed waterway (412)
3. Fencing (382)
4. Use exclusion (472)
5. Grade stabilization structure (410)
6. Critical area planting (342)
+ Research Objectives
General:
The overall goal is to develop better understanding of the integrated effects of
land use, land management (including conservation practices) and climate variations on
hydrologic processes at watershed to regional scales. The Southern Great Plains is
subject to recurring climate extremes, particularly drought, which slows economic growth
mainly due to limited and unreliable water supplies. Because agriculture dominates land
use, conservation and other agricultural management practices have a large impact on
water resources.
Specific:
1. Quantify hydrologic processes that affect regional surface water supplies as a
basis for development of strategies and methodologies to better meet the water
quantity and quality needs of downstream users.
2. Determine infiltration, ground water recharge and return flows to ascertain
impacts on ground water supplies And surface/groundwater interactions.
3. Integrate remote sensing estimates of surface soil water content with other
spatial data sets to monitor and predict root zone soil water content and
availability at regional scales to improve watershed and regional water balance
calculations.
+ Approaches
World-class instrumented watershed facilities, state-of-the-art simulation
models, field studies, and remotely sensed data are utilized in this project to address the
three interrelated objectives noted above. Hydrologic data collected between 1961-1985
from various sub-basins within the Upper Washita Watershed are available for model
calibration. Weir sites from prior studies still exist and could be re-instrumented, if
needed and pending land owner approval. Substantial monitoring of climate and
streamflow is supported by ARS, the Oklahoma Mesonet, and USGS in the LWREW and
Fort Cobb watershed. Extensive monitoring was conducted from 2000 to 2002 by USGS
in the Fort Cobb watershed. Beginning in 2005, a bi-weekly cycle of stream water
quality measurement will be initiated by ARS, including: pH, dissolved oxygen,
conductivity, salinity, total dissolved solids, temperature, turbidity, oxygen reduction
potential, nitrate concentration, ammonia concentration, suspended sediment, and
phosphorus.
The Great Plains RC&D will work collaboratively with ARS to contact farmers to obtain
conservation and production management information relevant to the assessments. The
Oklahoma Conservation Commission will conduct a habitat assessment of selected
stream segments.
The suite of EPIC/APEX/SWAT models will be used in scaling analyses to determine
linkages of conservation practices, soil properties, edge-of-field responses, and
watershed scale responses. The SWAT and SWAT/MOD models will be used for
assessing the impacts of conservation practices on surface and groundwater,
respectively, at the watershed scale. CONCEPTS will be used to assess the role of
stream bank stability and channel processes within the watershed. Land use, soil,
remotely sensed estimates of surface soil water content, and other spatial data sets will
be utilized to produce regional estimates of soil water content in the root zone. Impacts
of conservation practices on soil physical, biological, and chemical properties will be
evaluated collaboratively with the National Soil Erosion Laboratory. Geohydrologic data
will include groundwater data sets from historic ARS wells, USGS groundwater wells
from surrounding areas, and historical and current stream gages. The historical
database contains data for 34 drill holes, for which 21 were used to monitor ground
water levels within the LWREW. The other 13 drill holes were used for stratigraphic
control. In addition, historical databases from hundreds of monitoring wells from other
experimental watersheds in this region, and in similar geologic terrain, are also available.
Areas within the LWREW and Ft. Cobb watersheds that have little stratigraphic control
will be drilled, cored, and some will be completed as groundwater monitoring wells to
provide insight in regions where information is scarce.
+ Selected References
1. Van Liew, M.W. and Garbrecht, J.D. Hydrologic simulation of the Little Washita River
Experimental Watershed using SWAT. J. Amer. Water Resources Assoc. 39(2):413-
426. 2003. 2/7/05 CEAP Project Plan 132
2. Van Liew, M.W., Arnold, J.G., and Garbrecht, J.D. Hydrologic simulation on
agricultural watersheds: choosing between two models. Trans. ASAE. 46(6):1539-
1551. 2003.
3. Van Liew, M.W., Garbrecht, J.D., and Arnold, J.G. 2003. Simulation of the impacts
of flood retarding structures on streamflow for a watershed in Southwestern
Oklahoma. J. Soil and Water Cons. 58(6):340-348.
4. Van Liew, M.W. 2004. Impact of flood retarding structures on simulated streamflow
for various sized watersheds under varying climatic conditions. GIS and Remote
Sensing in Hydrology, Water Resources and Environment (Proceedings of
ICGRHWE held at the Three Gorges Dam, China, September 2003. IAHS Publ.
289:33-40.
+ Collaborators and Cooperating Agencies and Groups
USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Laboratory, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
United States Geological Survey, Environmental Protection Agency, Oklahoma
Climatological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma
Conservation Commission, Great Plains RC&D, Local Landowners